![]() ![]() And I was kind of disheartened to read that it's "working to optimize the performance of higher powered processing systems and higher resolution monitors." That's probably why the 16-core system with an 8K monitor I tried it on didn't feel as fast as I expected and why using it on a 4K monitor still results in unusably small menu text. ![]() But I want to start viewing the full-res images while it's still importing, so I need a real speedup. So Adobe split the file ingestion aspect of importing from the preview generation to make it seem faster the thumbnails come in zippily, and you can see the preview generation slogging behind. For instance, importing has always been notably slow. At the very least, CC will suck up development resources that might otherwise have gone to Classic.Īdobe has sort of addressed the biggest performance pains. Lightroom CC is The Future, and labeling this one "Classic" feels like the beginning of the end. But it feels like Adobe doesn't really plan to fix the architectural problems with it, such as only being able to sync a single catalog. And it does sync files with the other versions. (The Creative Cloud app still doesn't let you selectively sync directories or files after several years, so every time I install on a new system, which I do a lot, it starts syncing the 22,000 files I have in that CC account.) Adobe's ready to serve up more storage in exchange for your money, though. You have no granular control over what lives locally or selectively sync, which means some people are going to hit that 1TB limit fast.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |